There's a meme at the end of this, but first an explanation as to why it may be worth your time...
There's been a lot of back and forth over the last couple days about Immersionism and Augmentation. Most of it largely unproductive, people shouting at each other, with only the best among them listening and debating. Much of it seems to be argument about the very meaning of the words, which no one can agree on. There's probably some gems to be gleaned from both of these series arguments, but I wonder if we're missing the point.
Concrete statments: Actions we will and won't take in-world. What does trust mean to us? Open statements about what we want out of SL. Honesty about what (if any) FL benefit we are looking to take from the world (and "none, other than enjoyment" is a perfectly valid answer).
These are the things we should be showing others, because they are not debatable, they are what we are. *Then* we can proceed with the real question: given those beliefs and personal principles, can we build a place/system that lets us live together, and if so, how? What social structures can be built to allow virtual denizens of varying beliefs to live together? What kind of rules can both sides abide by without compromising their principes?
Screw definitions...leave that to the ancient Greeks. Let's state our principles and personal goals, line by line, and start to find common ground. Because it may be valid to argue drinking Coca Cola is bad for you, but only a dick is going to argue that you don't actually like it.
Here are some rules I live by, and some things I like:
OK...meme time:
If you are so inclined, give me a few rules you live by in SL, and a few things you get out of being here. Don't talk about your expectations on others, talk about you. I did 9 things, which is a bit much. Do how ever many you need, no more. Post links in the comments column. Pass it on.
There's been a lot of back and forth over the last couple days about Immersionism and Augmentation. Most of it largely unproductive, people shouting at each other, with only the best among them listening and debating. Much of it seems to be argument about the very meaning of the words, which no one can agree on. There's probably some gems to be gleaned from both of these series arguments, but I wonder if we're missing the point.
Concrete statments: Actions we will and won't take in-world. What does trust mean to us? Open statements about what we want out of SL. Honesty about what (if any) FL benefit we are looking to take from the world (and "none, other than enjoyment" is a perfectly valid answer).
These are the things we should be showing others, because they are not debatable, they are what we are. *Then* we can proceed with the real question: given those beliefs and personal principles, can we build a place/system that lets us live together, and if so, how? What social structures can be built to allow virtual denizens of varying beliefs to live together? What kind of rules can both sides abide by without compromising their principes?
Screw definitions...leave that to the ancient Greeks. Let's state our principles and personal goals, line by line, and start to find common ground. Because it may be valid to argue drinking Coca Cola is bad for you, but only a dick is going to argue that you don't actually like it.
Here are some rules I live by, and some things I like:
OK...meme time:
If you are so inclined, give me a few rules you live by in SL, and a few things you get out of being here. Don't talk about your expectations on others, talk about you. I did 9 things, which is a bit much. Do how ever many you need, no more. Post links in the comments column. Pass it on.
Current Mood:
thoughtful
12 comments | Leave a comment

